World is now on Opti ID! Learn more

Daniel Ovaska
Feb 25, 2021
  26
(0 votes)

Security issue with multiple package sources

Scenario

You are using a private nuget feed for a single package v 1.0.0 and a public nuget feed for the rest of your packages. An attacker can then upload a new package to public nuget feed using the same name as your private package but with a higher bug fix version v 1.0.1. Unless you have thought about this scenario your build server will look across all package sources and pick the most updated version (the faked 1.0.1 version on the public feed). So if you are using a private package source you are still not safe unless that is the only source you are using for your packages.

Solution

More detailed information can be found here about this vulnerability (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-24105) along with suggestions for how to mitigate the risks.

For high security scenarios:

  • Use one feed. If you have a private feed with internal packages, make that the only feed and add secure handling of public packages to that feed if you need. All projects should then use that one safe feed.
    https://azure.microsoft.com/sv-se/services/devops/artifacts/ is a good option that can deliver that if you don't want to create your own.

Additional mitigation:

  • Lock down your versions and make sure your build server can't update minor version automatically.
    Both npm and nuget can generate such a lock file easily that can then be used to force build server to use a specific version of all dependencies. Use nuget restore --lockedmode on CI servers to use the lock file.
  • Make sure one package can only be downloaded from one source.
    Use scope and npmrc file for npm to specify source per package. Use id prefix for nuget packages to block private packages from being uploaded to public feeds.

This is not an Episerver specific vulnerability but good to be aware of if security is important for your site.

I've added it to my security checklist for Episerver solutions, If you haven't gone through that for your site, I would suggest starting at the top and work your way down until you reach a decent level for your security requirements. 

Stay safe, don't get hacked! Happy coding!

Feb 25, 2021

Comments

Please login to comment.
Latest blogs
Make Global Assets Site- and Language-Aware at Indexing Time

I had a support case the other day with a question around search on global assets on a multisite. This is the result of that investigation. This co...

dada | Jun 26, 2025

The remote server returned an error: (400) Bad Request – when configuring Azure Storage for an older Optimizely CMS site

How to fix a strange issue that occurred when I moved editor-uploaded files for some old Optimizely CMS 11 solutions to Azure Storage.

Tomas Hensrud Gulla | Jun 26, 2025 |

Enable Opal AI for your Optimizely products

Learn how to enable Opal AI, and meet your infinite workforce.

Tomas Hensrud Gulla | Jun 25, 2025 |

Deploying to Optimizely Frontend Hosting: A Practical Guide

Optimizely Frontend Hosting is a cloud-based solution for deploying headless frontend applications - currently supporting only Next.js projects. It...

Szymon Uryga | Jun 25, 2025

World on Opti ID

We're excited to announce that world.optimizely.com is now integrated with Opti ID! What does this mean for you? New Users:  You can now log in wit...

Patrick Lam | Jun 22, 2025

Avoid Scandinavian Letters in File Names in Optimizely CMS

Discover how Scandinavian letters in file names can break media in Optimizely CMS—and learn a simple code fix to automatically sanitize uploads for...

Henning Sjørbotten | Jun 19, 2025 |