World is now on Opti ID! Learn more

John-Philip Johansson
Jun 13, 2017
  2642
(0 votes)

Introducing Group/Role support in Content Approvals

This feature was released in CMS UI 10.10.0.

What are Groups/Roles?

Groups, or Roles, are already commonly used in the CMS to manage access rights and other settings that should apply to a group of users instead of setting them individually. A commonly mentioned use case for Content Approvals is to add a group of users to a step instead of individual users. For example, adding the "Legal Department" group as a reviewer. This makes setting up content approval sequences easier as well as allowing the members of a group to change without having to change the sequence. So if there's a new hire in the "Legal Department" or someone leaves for another position, you just have to update the group and the new hire is included in the reviews (both ongoing and future reviews) and the removed user can no longer review content.

 Image blog-role-reviewer.gif

What about Notifications in large groups?

Adding a very large group will result in notifications being sent out to all the current members of the group on every step in a content approval sequence. This can have negative effects on the performance of the server, as well as probably annoy users. Therefore, we have added a new configuration setting, "ApprovalStepRoleUserLimit", that defaults to 100 users per group. Adding a group larger than this setting to a content approval sequence, triggers a validation warning, and it also limits the amount of notifications per group.

What are known limitations?

There can be limitations depending on the role provider used. See the SDK for more information.

Jun 13, 2017

Comments

Please login to comment.
Latest blogs
Make Global Assets Site- and Language-Aware at Indexing Time

I had a support case the other day with a question around search on global assets on a multisite. This is the result of that investigation. This co...

dada | Jun 26, 2025

The remote server returned an error: (400) Bad Request – when configuring Azure Storage for an older Optimizely CMS site

How to fix a strange issue that occurred when I moved editor-uploaded files for some old Optimizely CMS 11 solutions to Azure Storage.

Tomas Hensrud Gulla | Jun 26, 2025 |

Enable Opal AI for your Optimizely products

Learn how to enable Opal AI, and meet your infinite workforce.

Tomas Hensrud Gulla | Jun 25, 2025 |

Deploying to Optimizely Frontend Hosting: A Practical Guide

Optimizely Frontend Hosting is a cloud-based solution for deploying headless frontend applications - currently supporting only Next.js projects. It...

Szymon Uryga | Jun 25, 2025

World on Opti ID

We're excited to announce that world.optimizely.com is now integrated with Opti ID! What does this mean for you? New Users:  You can now log in wit...

Patrick Lam | Jun 22, 2025

Avoid Scandinavian Letters in File Names in Optimizely CMS

Discover how Scandinavian letters in file names can break media in Optimizely CMS—and learn a simple code fix to automatically sanitize uploads for...

Henning Sjørbotten | Jun 19, 2025 |