World is now on Opti ID! Learn more

Mark Stott
Nov 19, 2021
  34
(0 votes)

Adding Secure Headers in Optimizely CMS 12

I have previously blogged about this in a pure .NET 5.0 context on my own blog here: Secure Headers in .NET 5.0. In this version of this post I have adapted the solution to work with an Optimizely CMS Build.

I have been building .NET 5.0 websites for personal projects as well as reviewing the move from .NET 4.8 to .NET 5.0 by Optimizely and seeing the evolution of the CMS solution.  In any website build it is best practice to remove any headers that your website may produce which expose the underlying technology stack and version.  This is known as information leakage and provides malicious actors with information that allows them to understand the security flaws in the hosting technologies utilized by your website.  It is also best practice to provide headers which instruct the user's browser as to how your website can use third parties and be used by third parties in order to offer the best protection for the user.

.NET 5.0 and .NET Core 3.1 follow a common pattern in how you build websites.  Web.config is meant to be a thing of the past with configuration of the site moving to appsettings.json and code.  A good place to add security headers to your requests is to create a security header middleware. However the routing of the CMS content does not pass through this middleware so I've fallen back to Action Attributes:

namespace MyProject.Features.Security
{
    using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Filters;

    public class SecurityHeaderActionAttribute : ActionFilterAttribute
    {
        public override void OnResultExecuting(ResultExecutingContext context)
        {
            base.OnResultExecuting(context);

            context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("X-Frame-Options", "SAMEORIGIN");
            context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("X-Xss-Protection", "1; mode=block");
            context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("X-Content-Type-Options", "nosniff");
            context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("Referrer-Policy", "no-referrer");

            context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("Content-Security-Policy", "default-src 'self'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://cdn.jsdelivr.net; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://cdn.jsdelivr.net; img-src 'self' data: https:; frame-src 'self' https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/;");
        }
    }
}

I did find that I couldn't remove the server and x-powered-by headers using this method.  As it turns out, these are added by the hosting technology, in this case IIS.  The only way to remove these headers was to add a minimal web.config file to the web solution that contained just enough configuration to remove these headers.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<configuration>
   <system.webServer>
       <httpProtocol>
           <customHeaders>
               <remove name="X-Powered-By" />
           </customHeaders>
       </httpProtocol>
       <security>
           <requestFiltering removeServerHeader="true" />
       </security>
   </system.webServer>
</configuration>

I spent a good while looking for this solution, almost every solution I could find was based on hosting within Kestrel rather than IIS.  If you are hosting with Kestrel, then you can remove the server header by updating your CreateHostBuilder method in program.cs to set the options for Kestrel to exclude the server header.

public static IHostBuilder CreateHostBuilder(string[] args, bool isDevelopment)
{
   return Host.CreateDefaultBuilder(args)
              .ConfigureCmsDefaults()
              .ConfigureWebHostDefaults(webBuilder =>
              {
                  webBuilder.UseStartup<Startup>();
                  webBuilder.UseKestrel(options => { options.AddServerHeader = false; });
              });
}
Nov 19, 2021

Comments

Please login to comment.
Latest blogs
Make Global Assets Site- and Language-Aware at Indexing Time

I had a support case the other day with a question around search on global assets on a multisite. This is the result of that investigation. This co...

dada | Jun 26, 2025

The remote server returned an error: (400) Bad Request – when configuring Azure Storage for an older Optimizely CMS site

How to fix a strange issue that occurred when I moved editor-uploaded files for some old Optimizely CMS 11 solutions to Azure Storage.

Tomas Hensrud Gulla | Jun 26, 2025 |

Enable Opal AI for your Optimizely products

Learn how to enable Opal AI, and meet your infinite workforce.

Tomas Hensrud Gulla | Jun 25, 2025 |

Deploying to Optimizely Frontend Hosting: A Practical Guide

Optimizely Frontend Hosting is a cloud-based solution for deploying headless frontend applications - currently supporting only Next.js projects. It...

Szymon Uryga | Jun 25, 2025

World on Opti ID

We're excited to announce that world.optimizely.com is now integrated with Opti ID! What does this mean for you? New Users:  You can now log in wit...

Patrick Lam | Jun 22, 2025

Avoid Scandinavian Letters in File Names in Optimizely CMS

Discover how Scandinavian letters in file names can break media in Optimizely CMS—and learn a simple code fix to automatically sanitize uploads for...

Henning Sjørbotten | Jun 19, 2025 |