Take the community feedback survey now.

Mark Stott
Nov 19, 2021
  47
(0 votes)

Adding Secure Headers in Optimizely CMS 12

I have previously blogged about this in a pure .NET 5.0 context on my own blog here: Secure Headers in .NET 5.0. In this version of this post I have adapted the solution to work with an Optimizely CMS Build.

I have been building .NET 5.0 websites for personal projects as well as reviewing the move from .NET 4.8 to .NET 5.0 by Optimizely and seeing the evolution of the CMS solution.  In any website build it is best practice to remove any headers that your website may produce which expose the underlying technology stack and version.  This is known as information leakage and provides malicious actors with information that allows them to understand the security flaws in the hosting technologies utilized by your website.  It is also best practice to provide headers which instruct the user's browser as to how your website can use third parties and be used by third parties in order to offer the best protection for the user.

.NET 5.0 and .NET Core 3.1 follow a common pattern in how you build websites.  Web.config is meant to be a thing of the past with configuration of the site moving to appsettings.json and code.  A good place to add security headers to your requests is to create a security header middleware. However the routing of the CMS content does not pass through this middleware so I've fallen back to Action Attributes:

namespace MyProject.Features.Security
{
    using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Filters;

    public class SecurityHeaderActionAttribute : ActionFilterAttribute
    {
        public override void OnResultExecuting(ResultExecutingContext context)
        {
            base.OnResultExecuting(context);

            context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("X-Frame-Options", "SAMEORIGIN");
            context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("X-Xss-Protection", "1; mode=block");
            context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("X-Content-Type-Options", "nosniff");
            context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("Referrer-Policy", "no-referrer");

            context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("Content-Security-Policy", "default-src 'self'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://cdn.jsdelivr.net; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://cdn.jsdelivr.net; img-src 'self' data: https:; frame-src 'self' https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/;");
        }
    }
}

I did find that I couldn't remove the server and x-powered-by headers using this method.  As it turns out, these are added by the hosting technology, in this case IIS.  The only way to remove these headers was to add a minimal web.config file to the web solution that contained just enough configuration to remove these headers.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<configuration>
   <system.webServer>
       <httpProtocol>
           <customHeaders>
               <remove name="X-Powered-By" />
           </customHeaders>
       </httpProtocol>
       <security>
           <requestFiltering removeServerHeader="true" />
       </security>
   </system.webServer>
</configuration>

I spent a good while looking for this solution, almost every solution I could find was based on hosting within Kestrel rather than IIS.  If you are hosting with Kestrel, then you can remove the server header by updating your CreateHostBuilder method in program.cs to set the options for Kestrel to exclude the server header.

public static IHostBuilder CreateHostBuilder(string[] args, bool isDevelopment)
{
   return Host.CreateDefaultBuilder(args)
              .ConfigureCmsDefaults()
              .ConfigureWebHostDefaults(webBuilder =>
              {
                  webBuilder.UseStartup<Startup>();
                  webBuilder.UseKestrel(options => { options.AddServerHeader = false; });
              });
}
Nov 19, 2021

Comments

Please login to comment.
Latest blogs
A day in the life of an Optimizely OMVP - Opticon London 2025

This installment of a day in the life of an Optimizely OMVP gives an in-depth coverage of my trip down to London to attend Opticon London 2025 held...

Graham Carr | Oct 2, 2025

Optimizely Web Experimentation Using Real-Time Segments: A Step-by-Step Guide

  Introduction Personalization has become de facto standard for any digital channel to improve the user's engagement KPI’s.  Personalization uses...

Ratish | Oct 1, 2025 |

Trigger DXP Warmup Locally to Catch Bugs & Performance Issues Early

Here’s our documentation on warmup in DXP : 🔗 https://docs.developers.optimizely.com/digital-experience-platform/docs/warming-up-sites What I didn...

dada | Sep 29, 2025

Creating Opal Tools for Stott Robots Handler

This summer, the Netcel Development team and I took part in Optimizely’s Opal Hackathon. The challenge from Optimizely was to extend Opal’s abiliti...

Mark Stott | Sep 28, 2025

Integrating Commerce Search v3 (Vertex AI) with Optimizely Configured Commerce

Introduction This blog provides a technical guide for integrating Commerce Search v3, which leverages Google Cloud's Vertex AI Search, into an...

Vaibhav | Sep 27, 2025

A day in the life of an Optimizely MVP - Opti Graph Extensions add-on v1.0.0 released

I am pleased to announce that the official v1.0.0 of the Opti Graph Extensions add-on has now been released and is generally available. Refer to my...

Graham Carr | Sep 25, 2025